OCD Grammar Mavens.....

User avatar
Suzon
Herd Member
Posts: 395
Joined: Sun Oct 11, 2015 5:44 pm
Location: Bay Area, CA & Middle of Nowhere, OR

OCD Grammar Mavens.....

Postby Suzon » Thu Sep 29, 2016 9:44 pm

Which do you prefer:

We recommend railings that meet modern safety standards be installed where needed.

We recommend railings meeting modern safety standards be installed where needed.

My brain has gone for a bit of a walkabout.

WheresMyWhite
500 post plus club
Posts: 960
Joined: Mon Oct 12, 2015 3:37 pm

Re: OCD Grammar Mavens.....

Postby WheresMyWhite » Thu Sep 29, 2016 10:39 pm

Me? Option 2 :)

And am I an OCD Grammar Maven? Haven't a clue ;)

myleetlepony
Herd Member
Posts: 218
Joined: Sun Oct 11, 2015 8:25 pm
Location: Northern IL

Re: OCD Grammar Mavens.....

Postby myleetlepony » Thu Sep 29, 2016 11:33 pm

#2

User avatar
Chisamba
Bringing Life to the DDBB
Posts: 4462
Joined: Sun Oct 11, 2015 10:33 pm
Location: New Jersey

Re: OCD Grammar Mavens.....

Postby Chisamba » Thu Sep 29, 2016 11:35 pm

see, i know nothing, i preferred number one. and i would probably throw in a comma too :)

PaulaO
Bringing Life to the DDBB
Posts: 2175
Joined: Sun Oct 11, 2015 4:16 pm
Location: Northern Illinois

Re: OCD Grammar Mavens.....

Postby PaulaO » Fri Sep 30, 2016 12:42 am

I vote #1.

User avatar
Sunshine2Me
Herd Member
Posts: 483
Joined: Mon Oct 12, 2015 3:59 am
Location: Central Illinois

Re: OCD Grammar Mavens.....

Postby Sunshine2Me » Fri Sep 30, 2016 12:44 am

Number 2. "That" is not necessary.

piedmontfields
Bringing Life to the DDBB
Posts: 2735
Joined: Mon Oct 19, 2015 4:41 pm
Location: E Tennessee USA

Re: OCD Grammar Mavens.....

Postby piedmontfields » Fri Sep 30, 2016 1:19 am

#1 for clarity. #2 for discussion.

The US DOE pays me for these distinctions LOL! :lol:

User avatar
Suzon
Herd Member
Posts: 395
Joined: Sun Oct 11, 2015 5:44 pm
Location: Bay Area, CA & Middle of Nowhere, OR

Re: OCD Grammar Mavens.....

Postby Suzon » Fri Sep 30, 2016 1:27 am

Going for clarity, so I'm going with #1.

Thanks everyone for the input on one silly stock phrase for building inspection reports.

Literiding
Herd Member
Posts: 149
Joined: Sun Oct 11, 2015 7:53 pm

Re: OCD Grammar Mavens.....

Postby Literiding » Fri Sep 30, 2016 1:36 am

As a one time technical writer, the "We recommend . . ." bothers me. Since this sentence appears to be from a report, there should be no pronoun. Whom ever signs the report owns the text by default. Then "recommend" is wishy washy and begs to be ignored. As Yoda said, "Do. Or do not. There is no try."

I would say something like, "As funds permit, modern railings meeting the applicable codes should be installed at the following locations:"

User avatar
Suzon
Herd Member
Posts: 395
Joined: Sun Oct 11, 2015 5:44 pm
Location: Bay Area, CA & Middle of Nowhere, OR

Re: OCD Grammar Mavens.....

Postby Suzon » Fri Sep 30, 2016 2:23 am

We're private building inspectors, we are not municipal code inspectors. You know those horrible people who come in and inspect the place before you buy it? By law, we cannot "act" like code, pest,or environmental inspectors, nor contractors or engineers, so the word "code" or anything about meeting code is out of our jurisdiction...which is just about as confusing as it gets because in reality we have to know what is and isn't correct "by code" for every aspect of a building.

We also don't "should." We have no authority. No one has to do anything we recommend. At the same time, people base a lot of their buying decisions on what we say. We can point out defects and recommend they be fixed, but we also aren't really supposed to prescribe the fix. We say, "we recommend repair by a qualified contractor" but we don't say "You should remove the damaged wood and sister in new pressure-treated joists."

So for the original phrase, we would point out the front porch guard railings are too low by modern standards, the right stairs are missing a hand-grip railing, and the openings on the rear deck guard railing are too wide. There's also all the yada yada as to why these things need improving (like your kid can fall through the wide openings, etc). To sum it all up, we recommend railings that meet modern safety standards be installed where needed. The person buying the house gets to decide if they even want to act on the recommendation and where they think they need new railings. As long as we've pointed out the problem, told them why it's a problem, and recommend they act, that's the end of our responsibility.They decide what they want to live with.

capstone
Herd Member
Posts: 411
Joined: Tue Oct 13, 2015 4:47 am

Re: OCD Grammar Mavens.....

Postby capstone » Fri Sep 30, 2016 4:25 am

Chisamba wrote:see, i know nothing, i preferred number one. and i would probably throw in a comma too :)

Me too, exactly! I told a friend yesterday that I'm a over-comma-er. :oops:

boots-aregard
Herd Member
Posts: 438
Joined: Sun Oct 11, 2015 7:47 pm
Location: San Jose, CA

Re: OCD Grammar Mavens.....

Postby boots-aregard » Fri Sep 30, 2016 3:12 pm

I'm a "that" girl, so #1. My brain stumbles over the other one, trying to figure out which "ing" is the gerund.

I'm writing withing no authoritying whatsoevering.

boots-aregard
Herd Member
Posts: 438
Joined: Sun Oct 11, 2015 7:47 pm
Location: San Jose, CA

Re: OCD Grammar Mavens.....

Postby boots-aregard » Fri Sep 30, 2016 6:40 pm

capstone wrote:Me too, exactly! I told a friend yesterday that I'm a over-comma-er. :oops:


How can you say that? It should be "Me, too, exactly!" Man... Somedays you can't even trust a person's own self-analysis.

capstone
Herd Member
Posts: 411
Joined: Tue Oct 13, 2015 4:47 am

Re: OCD Grammar Mavens.....

Postby capstone » Fri Sep 30, 2016 8:42 pm

boots-aregard wrote:
capstone wrote:Me too, exactly! I told a friend yesterday that I'm a over-comma-er. :oops:


How can you say that? It should be "Me, too, exactly!" Man... Somedays you can't even trust a person's own self-analysis.

Oh, no! How embarrassing. :oops:

User avatar
Suzon
Herd Member
Posts: 395
Joined: Sun Oct 11, 2015 5:44 pm
Location: Bay Area, CA & Middle of Nowhere, OR

Re: OCD Grammar Mavens.....

Postby Suzon » Fri Sep 30, 2016 9:59 pm

capstone wrote:
boots-aregard wrote:
capstone wrote:Me too, exactly! I told a friend yesterday that I'm a over-comma-er. :oops:


How can you say that? It should be "Me, too, exactly!" Man... Somedays you can't even trust a person's own self-analysis.

Oh, no! How embarrassing. :oops:


Now, now. Do I need to get you ladies some self-help books? Or should we call in Dr. Phil? :lol:

capstone
Herd Member
Posts: 411
Joined: Tue Oct 13, 2015 4:47 am

Re: OCD Grammar Mavens.....

Postby capstone » Fri Sep 30, 2016 10:10 pm

Suzon wrote:
capstone wrote:
boots-aregard wrote:
How can you say that? It should be "Me, too, exactly!" Man... Somedays you can't even trust a person's own self-analysis.

Oh, no! How embarrassing. :oops:


Now, now. Do I need to get you ladies some self-help books? Or should we call in Dr. Phil? :lol:

Perhaps. My problem is worse than I thought - I over-comma in some situations and under-comma in others.

Rhianon
Herd Member
Posts: 312
Joined: Mon Oct 12, 2015 3:20 pm
Location: Vancouver Island, BC, Canada

Re: OCD Grammar Mavens.....

Postby Rhianon » Sat Oct 01, 2016 7:59 am

It doesn't matter. Both are fine. It's a style thing, not a grammar thing.


Return to “The Observation Lounge/ Cookbook Forum even Hot Topics”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 97 guests