Reconvening the Court of Grammatical Peeves

KathyK
Bringing Life to the DDBB
Posts: 1123
Joined: Sun Oct 11, 2015 1:19 pm
Location: Beautiful Aurora, Ohio

Reconvening the Court of Grammatical Peeves

Postby KathyK » Sun Nov 22, 2015 12:28 am

What is with the multiple commas? I'm starting to see them everywhere.

Next!

PaulaO
Bringing Life to the DDBB
Posts: 2175
Joined: Sun Oct 11, 2015 4:16 pm
Location: Northern Illinois

Re: Reconvening the Court of Grammatical Peeves

Postby PaulaO » Sun Nov 22, 2015 1:10 am

Could the commas be from typing on a tablet or cell phone?

My biggest peeve is the misuse of the apostrophe. You do not use apostrophes to denote plural!!!

silk
500 post plus club
Posts: 594
Joined: Tue Oct 13, 2015 7:17 am
Location: Hamilton, New Zealand

Re: Reconvening the Court of Grammatical Peeves

Postby silk » Sun Nov 22, 2015 2:08 am

"Feathers" on a horse.... No, feathers are on birds, and feather is on a horse.

redsoxluvr
Herd Member
Posts: 363
Joined: Mon Oct 12, 2015 12:02 am

Re: Reconvening the Court of Grammatical Peeves

Postby redsoxluvr » Sun Nov 22, 2015 2:11 am

PaulaO wrote:Could the commas be from typing on a tablet or cell phone?

My biggest peeve is the misuse of the apostrophe. You do not use apostrophes to denote plural!!!



YES! They are horses, not horse's. (Example, I am going to feed my horse's.) There are four Saturdays in a month, not Saturday's.

I also cannot stand when people use inappropriate commas. (Example, Jethro, is going, to come home today. )

I blame autocorrect. :/

AirsAboveNC
Novice
Posts: 61
Joined: Mon Oct 12, 2015 3:32 pm
Location: Formerly Above AZ

Re: Reconvening the Court of Grammatical Peeves

Postby AirsAboveNC » Sun Nov 22, 2015 3:04 am

When you are referring to another person and yourself, "Bob and I" is not an ironclad rule. If you don't know which pronoun to use for yourself, take the other person out of the sentence and see how you'd refer to yourself. And then add the other person back in. And please. PLEASE. I's is not a word. If you're talking about something possessive, the same applies - whatever pronoun you'd use if it was just you is the same one you use if it's Bob and you. Whose is this? Bob's and mine. It's Bob's and my anniversary this week. Not Bob and I's anniversary. That makes no sense.

Thank you and good night.

capstone
Herd Member
Posts: 411
Joined: Tue Oct 13, 2015 4:47 am

Re: Reconvening the Court of Grammatical Peeves

Postby capstone » Sun Nov 22, 2015 3:48 am

image.jpeg
image.jpeg (101.24 KiB) Viewed 28104 times
The first menu item on this web site almost killed me when I stumbled onto it.

FlyingLily
Novice
Posts: 63
Joined: Sun Oct 11, 2015 4:21 pm
Location: South Texas

Re: Reconvening the Court of Grammatical Peeves

Postby FlyingLily » Sun Nov 22, 2015 10:50 am

Loose weight and lounging horses.

KathyK
Bringing Life to the DDBB
Posts: 1123
Joined: Sun Oct 11, 2015 1:19 pm
Location: Beautiful Aurora, Ohio

Re: Reconvening the Court of Grammatical Peeves

Postby KathyK » Sun Nov 22, 2015 11:31 am

Seen on a shelf label at Schneiders - yes, that Schneiders:

"Prince of Whales Spurs"

silk wrote:"Feathers" on a horse.... No, feathers are on birds, and feather is on a horse.

See, I don't consider that to be a grammatical error, as it's not something we could have and should have learned in school.

pawsplus
Herd Member
Posts: 83
Joined: Sun Oct 11, 2015 7:45 pm

Re: Reconvening the Court of Grammatical Peeves

Postby pawsplus » Sun Nov 22, 2015 12:39 pm

Spelling, not grammar, but "balling my eyes out" just kills me. Really???!?! Think about that for a minute. It's "bawling," people. And, of course, "lounging" and "confirmation." <shudder>

demi
Bringing Life to the DDBB
Posts: 2218
Joined: Sun Oct 11, 2015 7:02 pm
Location: Texas

Re: Reconvening the Court of Grammatical Peeves

Postby demi » Sun Nov 22, 2015 1:01 pm

Ok, ok, ok, I make the "lounging" error. I have no idea why. I know better. Please don't hit me with a lounge whip!!

demi
Bringing Life to the DDBB
Posts: 2218
Joined: Sun Oct 11, 2015 7:02 pm
Location: Texas

Re: Reconvening the Court of Grammatical Peeves

Postby demi » Sun Nov 22, 2015 1:01 pm

Oops. I mean LUNGE whip.

KathyK
Bringing Life to the DDBB
Posts: 1123
Joined: Sun Oct 11, 2015 1:19 pm
Location: Beautiful Aurora, Ohio

Re: Reconvening the Court of Grammatical Peeves

Postby KathyK » Sun Nov 22, 2015 1:07 pm

Actually, it's longe.

According to Wikipedia:
The word is believed to be derived from either the French word allonge,[1] meaning "to lengthen",[2] or the Latin longa ("long").[1] In both cases, the root word featured spelling with an "o" and emphasizes lengthening and extension, so although always pronounced "lungeing", the traditional spelling of the word in English is "longeing"

demi
Bringing Life to the DDBB
Posts: 2218
Joined: Sun Oct 11, 2015 7:02 pm
Location: Texas

Re: Reconvening the Court of Grammatical Peeves

Postby demi » Sun Nov 22, 2015 1:39 pm

Lunge. I deserve the rolling eye expression!

But, as far as someone balling her eyes out, anyone who makes such a darling home for Guinea pigs can cry anyway she wants over a sick 24 yr old mare.

demi
Bringing Life to the DDBB
Posts: 2218
Joined: Sun Oct 11, 2015 7:02 pm
Location: Texas

Re: Reconvening the Court of Grammatical Peeves

Postby demi » Sun Nov 22, 2015 1:40 pm

Oops. I mean LONGE.

Astral
Herd Member
Posts: 90
Joined: Sun Oct 11, 2015 1:13 pm
Location: New York, instead of New England

Re: Reconvening the Court of Grammatical Peeves

Postby Astral » Sun Nov 22, 2015 1:51 pm

AirsAboveNC wrote:When you are referring to another person and yourself, "Bob and I" is not an ironclad rule. If you don't know which pronoun to use for yourself, take the other person out of the sentence and see how you'd refer to yourself. And then add the other person back in. And please. PLEASE. I's is not a word. If you're talking about something possessive, the same applies - whatever pronoun you'd use if it was just you is the same one you use if it's Bob and you. Whose is this? Bob's and mine. It's Bob's and my anniversary this week. Not Bob and I's anniversary. That makes no sense.

Thank you and good night.


It's not "Bob and my's anniversary" either. Heard that one too many times.

Heighth. Not a word. Sorry.

The over-use of apostrophes kills me. I fear that it's become so rampant that it's going to become the new norm and people are just going to accept it.

Some of the errors that could just be typos don't get to me *as* much, though it would be nice if people proofread their texts/emails/etc.

The lack of interest in properly conjugating verbs. "I falled down," "I runned to the store," etc etc. Your spellcheck should be ALL over that...

The misuse of common phrases be people trying to make their statements wordier - "all intensive purposes" is far more common than it should be.

seahorsefarm
Greenie
Posts: 14
Joined: Fri Nov 13, 2015 9:36 pm

Re: Reconvening the Court of Grammatical Peeves

Postby seahorsefarm » Sun Nov 22, 2015 3:24 pm

silk wrote:"Feathers" on a horse.... No, feathers are on birds, and feather is on a horse.


I've heard and used this for so long (singular or plural) that I thought it was just another piece of horse-y jargon and it doesn't bother me in the least.

Chestnuts on horses' legs on the other hand....... ;)

Paints
Herd Member
Posts: 79
Joined: Tue Oct 20, 2015 1:46 pm
Location: Hamilton, ON

Re: Reconvening the Court of Grammatical Peeves

Postby Paints » Sun Nov 22, 2015 3:48 pm

FlyingLily wrote:Loose weight and lounging horses.


I don't know, my weight has become looser since my horse has been lounging on stall rest. :lol:

DJR
500 post plus club
Posts: 529
Joined: Sun Oct 11, 2015 12:59 pm
Location: eastern Ontario, Canada

Re: Reconvening the Court of Grammatical Peeves

Postby DJR » Sun Nov 22, 2015 3:55 pm

Then/than - some people don't seem to understand the difference.

"My horse was wondering around in the field." Not wandering around? I picture a horse assuming a very philosophical stance as it grazes, wondering about life & such!

There are many more, but I'll stop there.
formerly known as "Deanna" on UDBB -- and prior to that, as "DJD".

Rockabilly
Herd Member
Posts: 459
Joined: Sun Oct 11, 2015 1:06 pm
Location: Tennessee

Re: Reconvening the Court of Grammatical Peeves

Postby Rockabilly » Sun Nov 22, 2015 4:07 pm

Oh, don't get me started! Just about every single article on the web is full of grammar and spelling mistakes. I admit I'm an old fart, but why isn't this taught in school anymore?

I cringe when I hear "I'ma".

Red Barn
Greenie
Posts: 38
Joined: Sun Oct 11, 2015 2:46 pm

Re: Reconvening the Court of Grammatical Peeves

Postby Red Barn » Sun Nov 22, 2015 4:22 pm

Gifted. Lessoned. Cliniced. Trialed.

Image

seahorsefarm
Greenie
Posts: 14
Joined: Fri Nov 13, 2015 9:36 pm

Re: Reconvening the Court of Grammatical Peeves

Postby seahorsefarm » Sun Nov 22, 2015 4:37 pm

^^ And flatted. UGH.

seahorsefarm
Greenie
Posts: 14
Joined: Fri Nov 13, 2015 9:36 pm

Re: Reconvening the Court of Grammatical Peeves

Postby seahorsefarm » Sun Nov 22, 2015 4:49 pm

and honestly, I'd be really happy never to read about the fabulous dressage horse "Tortillas" again. :?

hoopoe
Herd Member
Posts: 201
Joined: Tue Oct 20, 2015 1:36 pm
Location: Western Washington

Re: Reconvening the Court of Grammatical Peeves

Postby hoopoe » Sun Nov 22, 2015 6:37 pm

Afraid to post for fear I might make a mistake

:?

:oops:

:lol:

KathyK
Bringing Life to the DDBB
Posts: 1123
Joined: Sun Oct 11, 2015 1:19 pm
Location: Beautiful Aurora, Ohio

Re: Reconvening the Court of Grammatical Peeves

Postby KathyK » Sun Nov 22, 2015 7:03 pm

Go ahead. Make our day.

User avatar
Suzon
Herd Member
Posts: 395
Joined: Sun Oct 11, 2015 5:44 pm
Location: Bay Area, CA & Middle of Nowhere, OR

Re: Reconvening the Court of Grammatical Peeves

Postby Suzon » Sun Nov 22, 2015 8:53 pm

hoopoe wrote:Afraid to post for fear I might make a mistake

:?

:oops:

:lol:



Or maybe that should read: I's afeared o' farkin' up.

myleetlepony
Herd Member
Posts: 218
Joined: Sun Oct 11, 2015 8:25 pm
Location: Northern IL

Re: Reconvening the Court of Grammatical Peeves

Postby myleetlepony » Sun Nov 22, 2015 9:27 pm

See/seen/saw....I cringe when those are misused.

redsoxluvr
Herd Member
Posts: 363
Joined: Mon Oct 12, 2015 12:02 am

Re: Reconvening the Court of Grammatical Peeves

Postby redsoxluvr » Sun Nov 22, 2015 10:32 pm

capstone wrote:
image.jpeg
The first menu item on this web site almost killed me when I stumbled onto it.


I saw that! It makes me grind my teeth repeatedly.

TeresaB
Greenie
Posts: 34
Joined: Mon Oct 12, 2015 2:37 pm
Location: Colorado

Re: Reconvening the Court of Grammatical Peeves

Postby TeresaB » Sun Nov 22, 2015 10:34 pm

The use of the incorrect tense of a word drives me nuts.

Judy come over and we had a great time.

My SO and his mom use come instead of came and it drives me INSANE. I want to scream, 'It already happened, she CAME over.'

Ok, I'm better now.

Koolkat
500 post plus club
Posts: 694
Joined: Mon Oct 12, 2015 2:15 am
Location: Cascade foothills

Re: Reconvening the Court of Grammatical Peeves

Postby Koolkat » Sun Nov 22, 2015 10:44 pm

Could we please discuss further and farther?

Lest I further err farther down the road.

Dapple Field
Herd Member
Posts: 115
Joined: Sun Oct 11, 2015 11:44 pm
Location: NorthEast Kingdom, VT

Re: Reconvening the Court of Grammatical Peeves

Postby Dapple Field » Mon Nov 23, 2015 1:26 am

Their, there, and they're seem to be something that has not been taught in elementary school anymore. Should there have been a comma after they're??

PaulaO
Bringing Life to the DDBB
Posts: 2175
Joined: Sun Oct 11, 2015 4:16 pm
Location: Northern Illinois

Re: Reconvening the Court of Grammatical Peeves

Postby PaulaO » Mon Nov 23, 2015 2:06 am

Dapple Field wrote:Their, there, and they're seem to be something that has not been taught in elementary school anymore. Should there have been a comma after they're??


If you believe in the Oxford comma, yes, there (not they're or their) would be a comma before the last thing in your (not you're) list. I'm an Oxford comma person.

heddylamar
Bringing Life to the DDBB
Posts: 1408
Joined: Wed Oct 14, 2015 3:04 pm
Location: Texas (o_O)

Re: Reconvening the Court of Grammatical Peeves

Postby heddylamar » Mon Nov 23, 2015 2:17 am

Seeing my own grammatical errors drives me nuts.

capstone
Herd Member
Posts: 411
Joined: Tue Oct 13, 2015 4:47 am

Re: Reconvening the Court of Grammatical Peeves

Postby capstone » Mon Nov 23, 2015 1:26 pm

redsoxluvr wrote:
capstone wrote:The first menu item on this web site almost killed me when I stumbled onto it.


I saw that! It makes me grind my teeth repeatedly.

Well, I emailed them about it. And they fixed it!
image.png
image.png (136.82 KiB) Viewed 27900 times

Tuddy
500 post plus club
Posts: 607
Joined: Sun Oct 11, 2015 1:19 pm
Location: Zehner, SK Canada

Re: Reconvening the Court of Grammatical Peeves

Postby Tuddy » Mon Nov 23, 2015 1:59 pm

The use of "loose" for "lose" gets me every.damn.time. BAH!

PaulaO
Bringing Life to the DDBB
Posts: 2175
Joined: Sun Oct 11, 2015 4:16 pm
Location: Northern Illinois

Re: Reconvening the Court of Grammatical Peeves

Postby PaulaO » Mon Nov 23, 2015 2:09 pm

Kudos to you Capstone! And kudos to Signature Spurs for correcting it.

KathyK
Bringing Life to the DDBB
Posts: 1123
Joined: Sun Oct 11, 2015 1:19 pm
Location: Beautiful Aurora, Ohio

Re: Reconvening the Court of Grammatical Peeves

Postby KathyK » Mon Nov 23, 2015 2:40 pm

PaulaO wrote:
Dapple Field wrote:Their, there, and they're seem to be something that has not been taught in elementary school anymore. Should there have been a comma after they're??


If you believe in the Oxford comma, yes, there (not they're or their) would be a comma before the last thing in your (not you're) list. I'm an Oxford comma person.

This is a little confusing. No, there should not be a comma after "they're," but if you're an Oxford comma person (as are all reasonable people IMHO), the comma after "there" is correct, right, and righteous.

Tarlo Farm
500 post plus club
Posts: 866
Joined: Mon Oct 12, 2015 5:20 pm
Location: NW Michigan

Re: Reconvening the Court of Grammatical Peeves

Postby Tarlo Farm » Mon Nov 23, 2015 4:31 pm

silk wrote:"Feathers" on a horse.... No, feathers are on birds, and feather is on a horse.


Wracking my old brain, but don't we call the long loose hairs around the fetlocks of draft horses (and Fresians), "feathers"?

"Literally", when one means "figuratively". Aghhhhhhhhh!

galopp
Herd Member
Posts: 250
Joined: Wed Oct 14, 2015 12:44 pm

Re: Reconvening the Court of Grammatical Peeves

Postby galopp » Mon Nov 23, 2015 4:41 pm

Yes, the hair on drafts = feathers https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/horsefeathers

And far as the work for lunge, or longe... it comes from longier https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Longeing and http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/longe?x=25&y=9

I had an english teacher who went ballistic over: the reason why is. It is either: the reason is, or the why is....but not both together.

DJR
500 post plus club
Posts: 529
Joined: Sun Oct 11, 2015 12:59 pm
Location: eastern Ontario, Canada

Re: Reconvening the Court of Grammatical Peeves

Postby DJR » Mon Nov 23, 2015 5:12 pm

I wouldn't trust wiktionary to be the definitive guide to whether the hair on a draft's legs is "feather" or "feathers".

Here is a site that goes into great detail on feathered horses. At the very end, there is a statement about "feather" vs. "feathers".
http://www.gypsyhorses.com/feather.htm

And here is a link to the breed standard at the "American Shire Association" website where, again, they refer to "feather" not "feathers".
http://shirehorse.org/breed-standard-page/

However, the UK Shire Association site shows only one reference to feather vs. feathers on their breed standard page, and they say "feathers" in that one reference. So, either feather or feathers is used by Shire authorities, but it seems that feather is favored over feathers in the reading I've done.
formerly known as "Deanna" on UDBB -- and prior to that, as "DJD".

Ponichiwa
500 post plus club
Posts: 851
Joined: Mon Oct 12, 2015 2:27 pm

Re: Reconvening the Court of Grammatical Peeves

Postby Ponichiwa » Mon Nov 23, 2015 5:21 pm

Highly recommended reading for the peeved:
http://www.amazon.com/Bad-English-Histo ... 0399165584

This isn't to say that I don't ever draw a line in the sand (seriously, people, if you're truncating a year it's '98, not 98') but it does help put things into (historical) perspective.

boots-aregard
Herd Member
Posts: 438
Joined: Sun Oct 11, 2015 7:47 pm
Location: San Jose, CA

Re: Reconvening the Court of Grammatical Peeves

Postby boots-aregard » Mon Nov 23, 2015 6:15 pm

PaulaO wrote:
Dapple Field wrote:Their, there, and they're seem to be something that has not been taught in elementary school anymore. Should there have been a comma after they're??


If you believe in the Oxford comma, yes, there (not they're or their) would be a comma before the last thing in your (not you're) list. I'm an Oxford comma person.


ack Ack ACK! NO!!!!!

Don Giovanni
Novice
Posts: 64
Joined: Tue Oct 13, 2015 5:46 pm

Re: Reconvening the Court of Grammatical Peeves

Postby Don Giovanni » Mon Nov 23, 2015 8:07 pm

capstone wrote:
image.jpeg
The first menu item on this web site almost killed me when I stumbled onto it.

It seems so random!! Why the apostrophe on some words and not others??

I saw a sign in front of a furniture store the other day advertising Tables, Chairs and Sofa's. WTH?

mld02004
Herd Member
Posts: 107
Joined: Tue Oct 13, 2015 12:52 am

Re: Reconvening the Court of Grammatical Peeves

Postby mld02004 » Tue Nov 24, 2015 1:26 am

My boss overuses quotes in her emails. And she overuses air quotes when you talk to her in person.

Sigh.

Astral
Herd Member
Posts: 90
Joined: Sun Oct 11, 2015 1:13 pm
Location: New York, instead of New England

Re: Reconvening the Court of Grammatical Peeves

Postby Astral » Tue Nov 24, 2015 1:29 am

I kid you not, the library local to where I used to work had a sign out for donations for their annual book fair: "Wanted: used DVD's, CD's, and Book's."
It hurt. It just hurt.

KathyK
Bringing Life to the DDBB
Posts: 1123
Joined: Sun Oct 11, 2015 1:19 pm
Location: Beautiful Aurora, Ohio

Re: Reconvening the Court of Grammatical Peeves

Postby KathyK » Tue Nov 24, 2015 1:59 am

:shock: :oops: :(

Rhianon
Herd Member
Posts: 312
Joined: Mon Oct 12, 2015 3:20 pm
Location: Vancouver Island, BC, Canada

Re: Reconvening the Court of Grammatical Peeves

Postby Rhianon » Tue Nov 24, 2015 7:27 am

Astral wrote:I kid you not, the library local to where I used to work had a sign out for donations for their annual book fair: "Wanted: used DVD's, CD's, and Book's."
It hurt. It just hurt.


Yes, ouch.

pawsplus
Herd Member
Posts: 83
Joined: Sun Oct 11, 2015 7:45 pm

Re: Reconvening the Court of Grammatical Peeves

Postby pawsplus » Tue Nov 24, 2015 12:05 pm

Also:

- "I had a couple dogs" instead of "I had a couple of dogs." I've heard it on NPR, so the end of the world has arrived. :-(

Chancellor
Site Admin
Posts: 1121
Joined: Mon Sep 14, 2015 8:26 am

Re: Reconvening the Court of Grammatical Peeves

Postby Chancellor » Tue Nov 24, 2015 2:21 pm

Don Giovanni wrote:
capstone wrote:
image.jpeg
The first menu item on this web site almost killed me when I stumbled onto it.

It seems so random!! Why the apostrophe on some words and not others??

I saw a sign in front of a furniture store the other day advertising Tables, Chairs and Sofa's. WTH?


I'd love to know why the LAST on the list needed the apostrophe but none of the others.

I was horrified that I actually used an apostrophe where it didn't belong and left it that way for awhile on Facebook! It's become too commonplace now to see misplaced apostrophes.

capstone
Herd Member
Posts: 411
Joined: Tue Oct 13, 2015 4:47 am

Re: Reconvening the Court of Grammatical Peeves

Postby capstone » Tue Nov 24, 2015 2:46 pm

Chancellor wrote:I was horrified that I actually used an apostrophe where it didn't belong and left it that way for awhile on Facebook! It's become too commonplace now to see misplaced apostrophes.

:shock:

Lol. I find this a bit like alot. Even though I know awhile can have its place, I believe this is not one.

"A while is a noun meaning “a length of time”

“I slept for a while.”
– (compare with “I slept for a bit” and “I slept for three hours”)
“I was away from my desk for a while.”
– (compare with “I was away from my desk for two minutes”)

Awhile is an adverb, meaning “for a time,” or literally, “for a while”.

“I slept awhile before dinner.”
(compare with “I slept deeply before dinner” and “I slept badly before dinner”.)
As you can see, the words can be used almost interchangeably in some cases – but a while needs to be accompanied by a preposition, such as “for” (“I slept for a while”) or “ago” (“I left work a while ago”). Awhile always means “for a while”."

Just goes to show that grammar is hard and we can easily make mistakes even while discussing it specifically.
Last edited by capstone on Tue Nov 24, 2015 3:49 pm, edited 2 times in total.

capstone
Herd Member
Posts: 411
Joined: Tue Oct 13, 2015 4:47 am

Re: Reconvening the Court of Grammatical Peeves

Postby capstone » Tue Nov 24, 2015 2:50 pm

Don Giovanni wrote:
capstone wrote:
image.jpeg
The first menu item on this web site almost killed me when I stumbled onto it.

It seems so random!! Why the apostrophe on some words and not others??

I saw a sign in front of a furniture store the other day advertising Tables, Chairs and Sofa's. WTH?

My guess is that the section for dog's (ha!) was done by someone different than the horse sections.


Return to “The Observation Lounge/ Cookbook Forum even Hot Topics”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 60 guests